Extrusions
Rods, tubes and profiles for struts, drive shafts, frames and bicycle components. Extrusion aligns the particles and gives good longitudinal properties.
Wrought aluminium matrix composites (Al-MMCs) are heat-treatable aluminium alloys containing fine ceramic particles, such as silicon carbide, alumina or titanium diboride, that are extruded, rolled or forged like conventional alloys. The particles raise stiffness, fatigue strength and wear resistance while density stays close to aluminium. This guide explains how they are made, what they can and cannot do, and how to decide whether one is worth specifying.

A metal matrix composite combines a metal with a second, much stiffer phase. In discontinuously reinforced aluminium (DRA), the second phase is ceramic particles a few micrometres across, or in newer grades much finer particles formed inside the melt. "Wrought" means the composite is supplied as billet that is then hot-worked into extrusions, plate, sheet or forgings, as opposed to cast composites poured directly into shape.
The aim is simple: aluminium alloys are light and strong but not very stiff, with an elastic modulus of about 70 GPa whatever the alloy. Strength can be raised by alloying and heat treatment; stiffness cannot. Adding ceramic particles is the only practical way to raise the modulus of an aluminium part substantially while keeping it light, and the particles also slow fatigue crack initiation and resist abrasive wear.
The trade-offs are just as real. Ductility and fracture toughness fall, machining becomes abrasive, fusion welding is difficult, and the material costs considerably more than standard 6061 or 7075. Wrought Al-MMCs are therefore engineering choices for parts where stiffness per kilogram, fatigue life or wear decide the design, not general-purpose replacements.
Proprietary trade names are common in this field, which makes comparisons difficult. The neutral way to describe a composite is the Aluminum Association system in ANSI H35.5, which builds on the normal alloy and temper designations of ANSI H35.1.
| Part of the code | Example | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Matrix alloy | 6061 | The aluminium alloy, by its registered designation |
| Reinforcement | Al₂O₃ | Chemical formula of the ceramic phase (SiC, Al₂O₃, B₄C, TiB₂) |
| Volume fraction and form | 20p | Volume percent, with p = particles, w = whiskers, f = fibres |
| Temper | -T6 | Standard temper designation of the matrix |
| Full designation | 6061/Al₂O₃/20p-T6 | 6061 reinforced with 20 vol % alumina particles, solution treated and aged |
When you compare offers, ask for this full description and for the test data behind it. A house code tells you nothing about matrix, particle type or loading, and two materials with similar strength can differ greatly in toughness and machinability.
| Reinforcement | Density (g/cm³) | Main benefit | Typical uses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon carbide (SiC) | 3.21 | Largest stiffness gain per volume, good wear resistance, low expansion | Structural struts, aerospace and space parts, brake components |
| Alumina (Al₂O₃) | 3.95 | Chemically stable, good wear resistance, well-established extrusion grades | Drive shafts, bicycle and sports parts, wear parts |
| Boron carbide (B₄C) | 2.52 | Very hard and light; boron-10 absorbs neutrons | Neutron-absorber plate for spent-fuel storage and transport |
| Titanium diboride (TiB₂), in situ | 4.5 | Very fine particles formed in the melt; better ductility than coarse additions | High-strength extrusions and forgings, additive-manufacturing feedstock |
Composite density follows the rule of mixtures. For a 6061 matrix (2.70 g/cm³), 20 vol % SiC gives about 2.80 g/cm³, 20 vol % alumina about 2.95 g/cm³ and 20 vol % boron carbide about 2.66 g/cm³. Even with heavy reinforcement, the material stays far lighter than titanium (about 4.4 g/cm³) or steel (about 7.8 g/cm³).
Exact values depend on matrix, particle size, loading, processing route and temper, and published datasheets vary widely. The table therefore shows the direction and approximate size of the changes for a 6xxx matrix with 15 – 25 vol % SiC or alumina, compared with the same alloy unreinforced in T6. Design data should always come from the producer's qualified test results.
| Property | Effect of particle reinforcement | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Elastic modulus | Rises from about 70 GPa to roughly 95 – 115 GPa | The main reason to use an MMC; gain is nearly linear with SiC loading |
| Specific stiffness (E/ρ) | Higher than aluminium, titanium and steel | Allows thinner, lighter sections at the same deflection |
| Tensile and yield strength | Moderate increase | Depends strongly on matrix and particle size; finer particles help |
| Elongation | Falls, often to a few percent | Design for limited ductility; avoid sharp notches |
| Fracture toughness | Falls | The key limitation for damage-tolerant structure |
| Fatigue strength | Higher, especially at high cycle counts | Benefit is largest in smooth, well-machined parts |
| Wear resistance | Much higher | Hard particles carry the load at the surface |
| Thermal expansion | Lower (towards 15 – 18 µm/m·K at high loadings) | Helps match ceramics, steel inserts or electronics |
| Thermal conductivity | Similar or slightly lower | SiC keeps conductivity reasonably high |
Claims of 800 MPa tensile strength or titanium-beating strength-to-weight should be treated with care. Such values, where real, apply to specific high-strength 7xxx-matrix grades in particular product forms and directions. Ask for the test standard, specimen direction and statistical basis before using them.
Powder-metallurgy routes generally give the most uniform particle distribution and best properties at high loadings; melt routes are more economical for large volumes. In both cases the consistency of particle distribution is what separates a reliable product from a variable one. Clusters of particles and small pores act as crack starters, so buyers of fatigue-critical parts should ask how distribution is measured, how often, and what acceptance limits apply to each lot.
Rods, tubes and profiles for struts, drive shafts, frames and bicycle components. Extrusion aligns the particles and gives good longitudinal properties.
Rolled products for stiff panels, neutron-absorber plate and machined structural parts.
Closed-die forgings and rolled rings for highly loaded rotating or reciprocating parts.
Stock for precision parts in optical, semiconductor and space equipment, where stiffness and dimensional stability matter.
Composite powders for additive manufacturing and near-net-shape parts; see our composite powder guide.
Ceramic particles are harder than carbide tool grades, so tool wear is rapid. Polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tooling is standard for production; coated carbide is used for short runs at reduced speed.
Use PCD or diamond-coated drills. Form-tapping is unsuitable; cut threads or use inserts.
Difficult: SiC can react with molten aluminium to form brittle aluminium carbide, and particles segregate in the weld pool. Avoid fusion welds in highly stressed areas.
Friction stir welding, mechanical fastening and adhesive bonding are the usual joining methods.
Limited cold formability. Bend hot or design parts to be machined from extrusions or plate.
Can be anodised, though the coating is less uniform than on monolithic alloys; conversion coatings and paints are also used.
In each case the part is designed around the composite's limits: generous radii, smooth surfaces, solid-state joints and allowance for lower ductility.
| Need | Consider first | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Highest static strength at low cost | 7075-T6 / T651, 7050-T7451 | Proven, widely certified, easy to machine |
| Damage tolerance and fatigue crack growth | 2024-T3 / T351, 7050 | Higher toughness than particle composites |
| Weldable high-strength structure | 2219, 6061, 6082 | Fusion-weldable with established procedures |
| Maximum stiffness per weight | SiC-reinforced Al-MMC | Modulus gain that no unreinforced alloy can match |
| Wear resistance in a light part | Al₂O₃ or SiC Al-MMC, or hard-anodised alloy | Choose the composite where coatings wear through |
| Neutron absorption | B₄C-aluminium composite | Boron-10 content with aluminium thermal conductivity |
A useful rule: if the design is limited by strength, stay with a conventional high-strength alloy; if it is limited by stiffness, vibration or wear, an aluminium composite may justify its cost. Common mistakes are specifying a composite for a part that will be welded, choosing on tensile strength alone without checking toughness, and underestimating machining cost.
Metline reviews composite enquiries case by case and supplies the conventional high-strength alternatives, such as 7075, 7050, 2024 and 2219, in plate, bar, extrusion and forged forms worldwide.
Higher stiffness at almost the same weight. Ceramic particles can raise the elastic modulus from about 70 GPa to around 100 GPa, which no conventional aluminium alloy can achieve, and they also improve fatigue and wear resistance.
In some stiffness-limited parts, yes, because their specific stiffness can exceed that of titanium. They have lower toughness and ductility and a lower temperature limit, so each part must be assessed individually.
Fusion welding is difficult and generally avoided in stressed areas. Friction stir welding, bolting, riveting and adhesive bonding are the normal joining methods.
The ceramic particles are harder than most cutting-tool materials and wear tools quickly. Polycrystalline diamond tools are the standard choice for production machining.
It is the ANSI H35.5 designation for a 6061 aluminium matrix containing 20 % by volume of alumina particles, in the T6 solution-treated and aged temper.
We review Al-MMC enquiries case by case and supply conventional high-strength aluminium alloys as alternatives, all with mill test certificates and worldwide shipping.
Tell us the part function, form, size and quantity. We will advise on composite or conventional alloy options and what can be supplied.